原子論：修订间差异 - 求闻百科，共笔求闻

（未显示2个用户的2个中间版本）

下文是求闻百科的历史内容，而非最新内容，不代表求闻百科的立场。
若历史内容含有不良信息，请点此报告；参见投诉举报处理方针。

第13行：

|isbn=0-391-02177-X

|oclc=10916778}}

</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Iannone|first= A. Pablo|year= 2001|title= Dictionary of World Philosophy|publisher= Routledge|isbn= 0415179955|oclc= 44541769|~~url= http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0415179955&pg=PA83~~|pages= 83,356|access-date= 2011-12-14~~|||~~}}</ref>的原子论认定为开创者[[笩駄摩那|大雄]]在公元前6世纪提出，并将与其同时代[[六师外道]]的{{en-link|正命论|Ājīvika}}和[[顺世派]]先驅的[[元素]]思想也称为原子论<ref>Thomas McEvilley, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies ISBN 1-58115-203-5, Allwarth Press, 2002, p. 317-321.</ref>。对于印度文化影响希腊还是反之，亦或二者独立演化迄今仍存在争议。<ref>{{cite book

</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Iannone|first= A. Pablo|year= 2001|title= Dictionary of World Philosophy|publisher= Routledge|isbn= 0415179955|oclc= 44541769||pages= 83,356|access-date= 2011-12-14}}</ref>的原子论认定为开创者[[笩駄摩那|大雄]]在公元前6世纪提出，并将与其同时代[[六师外道]]的{{en-link|正命论|Ājīvika}}和[[顺世派]]先驅的[[元素]]思想也称为原子论<ref>Thomas McEvilley, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies ISBN 1-58115-203-5, Allwarth Press, 2002, p. 317-321.</ref>。对于印度文化影响希腊还是反之，亦或二者独立演化迄今仍存在争议。<ref>{{cite book

|last=Teresi|first=Dick|publisher = Simon & Schuster

|title = Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science

第24行：

== 注解 ==

== 参考书目 ==

* Clericuzio, Antonio. ''Elements, Principles, and Corpuscles; a study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century''. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

@@ 第13行： / 第13行： @@
 |isbn=0-391-02177-X
 |oclc=10916778}}
-</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Iannone|first= A. Pablo|year= 2001|title= Dictionary of World Philosophy|publisher= Routledge|isbn= 0415179955|oclc= 44541769|url= http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0415179955&pg=PA83|pages= 83,356|access-date= 2011-12-14|||}}</ref>的原子论认定为开创者[[笩駄摩那|大雄]]在公元前6世纪提出，并将与其同时代[[六师外道]]的{{en-link|正命论|Ājīvika}}和[[顺世派]]先驅的[[元素]]思想也称为原子论<ref>Thomas McEvilley, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies ISBN 1-58115-203-5, Allwarth Press, 2002, p. 317-321.</ref>。对于印度文化影响希腊还是反之，亦或二者独立演化迄今仍存在争议。<ref>{{cite book
+</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Iannone|first= A. Pablo|year= 2001|title= Dictionary of World Philosophy|publisher= Routledge|isbn= 0415179955|oclc= 44541769||pages= 83,356|access-date= 2011-12-14}}</ref>的原子论认定为开创者[[笩駄摩那|大雄]]在公元前6世纪提出，并将与其同时代[[六师外道]]的{{en-link|正命论|Ājīvika}}和[[顺世派]]先驅的[[元素]]思想也称为原子论<ref>Thomas McEvilley, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies ISBN 1-58115-203-5, Allwarth Press, 2002, p. 317-321.</ref>。对于印度文化影响希腊还是反之，亦或二者独立演化迄今仍存在争议。<ref>{{cite book
 |last=Teresi|first=Dick|publisher = Simon & Schuster
 |title = Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science
@@ 第24行： / 第24行： @@
 == 注解 ==
 {{reflist}}
 == 参考书目 ==
 * Clericuzio, Antonio. ''Elements, Principles, and Corpuscles; a study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century''. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.