博斯曼法案：修订间差异

|Ruling=<!--1. Article 48 of the EEC Treaty precludes the application of rules laid down by sporting associations, under which a professional footballer who is a national of one Member State may not, on the expiration of his contract with a club, be employed by a club of another Member State unless the latter club has paid to the former club a transfer, training or development fee.<br/><br/>2. Article 48 of the EEC Treaty precludes the application of rules laid down by sporting associations under which, in matches in competitions which they organize, football clubs may field only a limited number of professional players who are nationals of other Member States.<br/><br/>3. The direct effect of Article 48 of the EEC Treaty cannot be relied upon in support of claims relating to a fee in respect of transfer, training or development which has already been paid on, or is still payable under an obligation which arose before, the date of this judgment, except by those who have brought court proceedings or raised an equivalent claim under the applicable national law before that date.-->

* {{cite web |url=http://www.liv.ac.uk/footballindustry/bosman.html |title=The Bosman Case, EU Law and the Transfer System |first=Geoff |last=Pearson |accessdate=24 January 2008 |publisher=Football Industry Group, University of Liverpool |||}}

* {{cite web|title=What was the Bosman ruling? The one minute guide|url=http://www.open.edu/openlearn/health-sports-psychology/health/sport-and-fitness/sport/what-was-the-bosman-ruling-the-one-minute-guide|website=OpenLearn|publisher=The Open University|accessdate=25 September 2015}}